Network Marketing - 1296 Words

The simplest explanation of network marketing is that it is a method of marketing that depends on independent representatives to reach potential customers that a company otherwise would not reach with traditional online or offline marketing methods. In order to accomplish this, network marketing companies and their associates recruit individuals I.E. â€Å"their sales force,† How often have you seen ads on television that use the term, â€Å"Independent Insurance Agent or Associate?† Yet, as we watch these advertisements we naturally assume they are employees of the company, when in reality they are independent business owners! No doubt you have noticed as you have driven through your neighborhood many of these small businesses, they have†¦show more content†¦In Network Marketing we help and assist others in building their business. We are also leveraging their time, with each of us is gathering customers along the way. Hence the name Network. We get paid for this because we are assisting, coaching and helping them to establish their business. Helping them to reach their goals for their financial future. So Its only right that we also get paid for our time? Lets take a look at a typical employer in a service industry with 100 or more employees. That has a labor rate of 60 dollars per hour. The goal of our employer is to keep each employee active and busy for each hour paid. Out of this once all the costs of doing business are factored in such as wages paid, health insurance, unemployment insurance, federal taxes, state taxes, fica taxes, permits, maintenance, housekeeping, the list just goes on and on. The employer may get to keep 5 to 10 dollars per hour of that labor rate. In Network Marketing, we have our initial start up costs anywhere from just a few dollars to several hundred dollars. Where most network marketers fail is they feel that they don’t need a marketing budget for advertising, they don’t seek out the education required to succeed. One of the important things to remember is, you are in a real business, you no longer have a boss holding you accountable. Your network marketing success or failure is dependent upon youShow MoreRelatedSocial Network Marketing And Social Networks3139 Words   |  13 PagesSocial Network Marketing Introduction Marketing in general it is the process to determine what products or services can be of interest to customer. Social networks or Social Media help in improving the marketing of organizations to new insights about the brand, which offers innovative ways to implement the basic marketing programs, as well as new methods to win in online discussions of important business. Social network marketing is an attempt to use social network to induce consumers that one sRead MoreNetwork Marketing2933 Words   |  12 PagesWhat is Network Marketing? Multi-level marketing (MLM), also known as Network Marketing, is a business-distribution model that allows a parent company to market its products directly to consumers by means of relationship referrals and direct selling. Independent, unsalaried salespeople of multi-level marketing, referred to as distributors (or associates, independent business owners, franchise owners, sales consultants, consultants, independent agents, etc.), represent the parent company and areRead MoreMarketing Analysis : C Network1737 Words   |  7 Pagesthe ways I plan to market the â€Å"T.G.C Network† will be strictly online. The main market strategy technique the I will use to market T.G.C Network is by blog marketing. Using blogs strictly geared toward the fashion and model industry, I will post about T.G.C Network and all it has to offer, as well as updates, and news. That way I am reaching only those that are interested in the modeling industry. I will also use Pinterest and YouTube to market T.G.C Network because models use these two medias toRead MoreMarketing Is A Complex Network Of Processes819 Words   |  4 PagesThe average person may not realize that marketing is a complex network of processes; not just product advertising (Kerin, Hartley, Rudelius, 2011). One might think of marketing as just the product advertising side of things in the world of goods and services. A large amount of people might not understand that marketing is a much more diverse set of steps, not just billboards and commercials. Marketing is the process that covers product distribution and concepts ranging all the way from realizationRead MoreMarketing and Online Social Networks1846 Words   |  8 Pagesfocused differentiation strategy. It focuses on singles seeking a serious relationship and long-term compatibility. It distinguished itself from other sites by using a unique matching algorithm. They have also invested substantial resources into marketing and RD. Problem Statement: eHarmony has opened the door to their competition by declining potential customers as a way to ensure quality control. eHarmony s CEO must decide how to react to imitations of its business model, encroachment by competingRead MoreNetwork Marketing And Its Strengths, Weaknesses, And Middle Ground1446 Words   |  6 Pagesa site about network marketing though having been a part of 6 of them in the past, I ve both made and lost money and can give you some unbiased thoughts on Network Marketing. Most especially I want people to understand that affiliate marketing and network marketing are not the same thing at all. I ve had many people ask me about Network Marketing and for some of my close friends and relatives they could tell you that, in the past, I have gotten wrapped up with some. Being a network marketer is notRead MoreSocial Media Marketing : A Social Network2042 Words   |  9 Pagesbusinesses with actives pages on the social network† (Ha, 2014). Social media marketing can be helpful company that is struggling with money because instead of spending costly amount of promoting the company they can now focus further on the product. Social media marketing still takes up a good amount of time, although it allows the consumers to find additional information concerning a company or product by simply â€Å"following† or â€Å"likening† a social network page. Social media is exceedingly beneficialRead MoreThe Impact Of Marketing On Social Networks1930 Words   |  8 PagesThis paper analyses the main issue for using marketing in social networks. First, it will discuss about why companies are interested in having an advertisement on social networks platforms. Second, it will identify the main issue for using marketing on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube based on technology and management. Third, it will provide some solutions for companies to follow up their customer’s requirement and feedback on social netw orks. Finally, it will evaluate these solutionsRead MoreA Research On Social Network Marketing3376 Words   |  14 PagesSocial Network Marketing Introduction Publicizing when all is said in done it is the methodology to make sense of what things or organizations can be of excitement to client. Casual groups or Social Media help in upgrading the elevating of relationship to new bits of learning about the brand, which offers inventive ways to deal with realize the key publicizing undertakings, and also new methods to win in online dialogs of basic business. Casual group promoting is an attempt to use interpersonalRead More10 Steps Of Network Marketing Online Success Essay1186 Words   |  5 PagesTo Network Marketing Online Success By Billee Brady | Submitted On May 05, 2011 Recommend Article Article Comments Print Article Share this article on Facebook Share this article on Twitter Share this article on Google+ Share this article on Linkedin Share this article on StumbleUpon Share this article on Delicious Share this article on Digg Share this article on Reddit Share this article on Pinterest Expert Author Billee Brady I just want to start out by saying that network marketing online

Should College Athletes Get Paid Free Essays

string(106) " but she weighed in with her opinion on whether or not college athletes should get more for what they do\." The question of whether or not college athletes should get paid is of heated debate in todays times. While many believe that student athletes are entitled to income, It remains undougtibly a concern of moral interest to universities across the country. This paper is going to explain the pros and cons that come with allowing student athletes the right to receive a salary. We will write a custom essay sample on Should College Athletes Get Paid? or any similar topic only for you Order Now Should college athletes be paid? Let’s take a quick glance at the pros and cons of each perspective. For starters, in my opinion, yes, college athletes should get paid. What deserves debate, is the conversation of how to get this done. From my experience, in America, you get paid in proportion to the value you bring to the marketplace. College sports is one, if not the only, place where this isn’t the case. it’s only a matter of time before players start getting more than â€Å"a free education. † There are plenty of cons that come with paying students to play sports. According to Title IX, a federally-mandated law, if conferences and schools decide to increase the value of student-athlete scholarships to cover living expenses, they have to do it for women’s programs as well. This means that schools would have to, for example, increase the value of womens volleyball and softball scholarships as well. Schools have to stay in-accordance with Title IX, otherwise they’re risking their federal funding. And you know they’re not trying to lose out on any money. Another argument as to why schools should not allow student athletes to get paid is the fact that small schools would be at a disadvantage. How would the smaller schools and conferences afford this? The bigger conferences make way more money than the smaller conferences through their huge tv deals. So unless the Big Ten’s, and SEC’s of the world agree to donate revenue to conferences that make afraction of what they make, (think MAC and Mountain West conferences), wouldn’t this create an even wider gap recruiting-wise between the powerhouse conferences and the smaller conferences? ask yourself; if you were to choose between playing football for a small school, and a big school that’s legally giving you $5,000 in living expenses, which would you choose? Most college athletic programs are already losing money, so how could they afford to all male and female athletic programs, to cover for the athlete’s living expenses? Another concern to paying student athletes is the question of whether to pay athletes of all sports? Let’s be real here; men’s football and basketball teams are usually the programs that make the most money for universities, so if football players and basketball players got paid, does that mean that the men’s lacrosse and baseball players would get paid too? Most schools would not have the findings to financially pay athletes of the fur major sports in the united states. Finally players are still going to take under the table money. In my opinion, increasing scholarship amounts to cover living expenses may keep some of the kids from accepting money, but it’s not going to keep them all from doing it. I don’t think kids getting an extra $5,000 or so from their Universities wouldn’t keep the agents, boosters, etc. , from offering them cash and benefits. But I must admit, it’s definitely a step that I believe would at least keep some of the kids from accepting benefits; those that only take the money because of their circumstances or lack of cash for living expenses. There are plenty of beliefs, which justify paying student athletes. Jim Tressel gets paid close to $1 million a year for trying to win as many football games as possible. His players, however, earn no salary for doing the same thing. Although college athletes do get rewarded with scholarship money, there is a debate around the country as to whether that amount is enough compensation for all the work required of student athletes each year. Several Ohio State coaches were recently asked if they thought college athletes should be paid a salary, and their responses varied. I believe there is a big difference between paper money and real money, and the scholarships these kids get are only paper money,† said basketball coach Jim O’Brien. â€Å"They need to have some real money to walk around with that they can live off of. † Student athletes are not allowed to work much under NCAA regulations, and those who are in favor of paying them often point to that rule as a reaso n college athletes need money. But that reason isn’t enough for all coaches to share O’Brien’s views toward paying student athletes. Wrestling coach Russ Hellickson answered the same question: Should student athletes be paid? He came up with a very different response. â€Å"No, but they should be able to get what, say, a Presidential Scholar gets,† he said in an e-mail. â€Å"This should be an educational experience. † Presidential Scholars receive full in-state tuition, room and board, book allowances and miscellaneous expenses — a total that OSU media relations estimates to be $12,483 per year for in-state students. That is nearly $2,000 more than an in-state athlete receives, even if they are awarded a full scholarship. Most of that $2,000 falls under the category of miscellaneous expenses, something athletes do not receive money for. The extra scholarship money is to be used for â€Å"athletic tickets, book costs, bus passes; anything that students need for living,† said Amy Murray, OSU spokeswoman. Some coaches are in favor of keeping things exactly as they are, without raising scholarship levels. Softball coach Linda Kalafatis said she did not feel well versed enough in the topic to know an answer to the question for sure, but she weighed in with her opinion on whether or not college athletes should get more for what they do. You read "Should College Athletes Get Paid?" in category "Papers" Softball coach Linda Kalafatis said she did not feel well versed enough in the topic to know an answer to the question for sure, but she weighed in with her opinion on whether or not college athletes should get more for what they do. â€Å"There are some good arguments out there for it, but I am against it,† she said. â€Å"The fact that our kids get scholarship opportunities and good exposure makes the experience good. One of the issues that may be a problem with paying college athletes is the difference in revenue that each sport brings in through television contracts and other sources. At OSU, football and basketball both bring in a large amount of money for the university every year, so some may argue that they deserve a percentage of that. But do football and basketball players deserve more than athletes who participate in non-revenue sports? Some coaches chose not to comment on the issue because it is a delicate subject. Those who did respond felt strongly towards equality. â€Å"If money is given, all tendered athletes should be the same,† Hellickson said. â€Å"This isn’t and shouldn’t be the pros. We have more class. Athletics Director Andy Geiger agreed, saying if a compensation plan ever went into effect, it would have to be equal for everybody. That’s the only way it works,† he said. â€Å"It would not work, for instance, if only football and basketball players were paid. † Title IX calls for scholarship equality in college athletics, so if pay ever was given to student athletes, all sports would probably receive t he same amount. The plan that is the most likely to take place in the next few years is the one Geiger mentioned during his recent interview. I wouldn’t mind seeing a liberalization of the financial aid rules to allow athletic grants and aid to move closer to the cost of education,† he said. â€Å"As far as players actually getting salaries — no. † Staying away from salaries for college athletes was the consensus of all coaches who chose to comment on the issue. â€Å"I’m not in favor of salaries, but some sort of stipend would be beneficial,† O’Brien said. When asked how much of a stipend he would like to see, O’Brien said that was something he did not know the answer to yet. He said it would have to be discussed at great length before he reached a decision. Another topic that is worth considering when deciding whether or not to pay student athletes is the fact that not all university sports programs earn as much as OSU’s. Equality is the key factor in this issue as well. Should a college with high-revenue programs, like OSU, be able to pay more than smaller Division I colleges? Under Title IX, the answer has to be no. â€Å"Since athletic budgets around the country aren’t all in as good shape as ours, I don’t really know how realistic a plan this is,† Kalafatis said. O’Brien said he agreed. â€Å"When you start talking about every sport at every college across the country, that’s a lot of money. Every sport would need to receive the same amount, so right now this is not too realistic of an option. † Hellickson thinks differently about the realism of the plan. Unfortunately, it will probably be driven through in the next five years by those who believe athletics is more important than education, With the popularity of sports nowadays, leagues are making more money than ever before. The universities are raking in the dough from these humongous television contracts, and the coaches and everybody else are seeing their fair share. † he said. Everybody waits in line for their piece of the pie, yet, the ones who make the system work are the ones who don’t even get to taste the crumbs that have fallen onto the table. In fact, while everyone is going up for seconds, the athletes don’t even get invited to the dinner table. I think we can all agree that collegiate sports is no longer an amateur enterprise, and I am not going to argue that fact with you. We can save that for a different time and different day of the week. Like everything in life, paying collegiate athletes has its pros and cons, but it would certainly save the sport of college basketball if some type of payment plan was installed. College basketball is by far a smaller market than college football is. I would say that more than half of the people that fill out the March Madness brackets don’t even pay attention to the season until the month of February rolls around. And there are certainly reasons for that. One is that the sport has to compete with college football and the NFL until late January, and another is that the sport is slowly but surely suffering a slow death. I can’t tell you how many times I have watched the â€Å"Fab Five† documentary on ESPN. I have watched it more than Seinfeld reruns, not because of everything they did for the game or because it was a great piece to keep you occupied when you have two hours to kill, but because I am wondering when or if we will ever see a team like that again. That squad was put together during the 1991 season, and all five of those players played at least two seasons. Four of the five stayed till their junior years, while two of the Fab Five played out their entire years of eligibility in a Michigan uniform. Nowadays, teams do land several of the most talented players in the country, but they end up leaving after one season. Even if the player is still raw at the position, needs to add on weight or could use another year to tweak his game, he is still off to the next level the second he hears he is first-round material and is guaranteed an NBA contract. Having players stay for more than one year would help create greater teams, as those programs would be able to add to the current talent rather than just replacing it. When you think of the greatest teams in college basketball, you think of teams that were likely formed before you were even born. That’s because the NBA wasn’t handing out ridiculously large sums of money to these athletes and making it such an easy choice to leave college. It would also help even out the recruiting process, giving some of these other teams a better shot at competing for a national championship. The players that are going to be one-and-done only want to play for the best of the best schools, so they choose Duke, Kentucky, Syracuse and North Carolina because it gives them the best chance to win a title in the one season they are on campus. Well, if players were being paid, it would certainly help create a little more of an even playing field. If that player was going to stay in school a little bit longer, why wouldn’t he think about staying close to home or joining a school with a little less talent where he can become the star rather than joining a team already stacked with 5-star recruits? Wouldn’t college basketball be a lot more interesting if it had many of the same players every year rather than having to get to know an entire roster every season? You thought Kentucky was good last season? Imagine if Brandon Knight and DeAndre Liggins had decided to stay for another season and had been a part of that championship roster. There is a reason that teams such as Harvard, Wichita State and Murray State are making noise lately, and it has a lot to do with experience on the roster. How to cite Should College Athletes Get Paid?, Papers

Role of State in Entrepreneurship Ecosystem †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Role of State in Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Answer: Introduction A startup incepts from a new and pioneering idea and implementing that idea into a successful business model. Startup ecosystem builds itself by creating new startup firms or companies. Entrepreneurs with their innovative idea build startups and organizations contribute to it for their profit- all these elements together lead up to the formation of the startup ecosystem ("Forbes Welcome", 2017). The below report analyzes the startup ecosystem of Singapore. It also details about the present position of Singapore in the list of the leading cities for startup ecosystem. It is necessary for any nation to promote and encourage startups as it contributes to the overall development of the nation not only economic (Nadgrodkiewicz, 2013). Until recently, entrepreneurship is considered an engine of development for developing and developed countries alike (Fuerlinger, Fandl Funke, 2015). Singapore realized the importance of startups during the 1985 economic recession period. During the 1990s, the country made some significant changes in its economic policies. However, the dot.com crash and the attacks of September 11, 2001, blunted the entrepreneurial growth in Singapore. The Singapore government dealt with this setback by setting up of the National Framework of Innovation Enterprise (NFIE), seven years after 9/11. Babsons framework of Startup Ecosystem In Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs (ANDE) 2013 review of startup ecosystems, it made a comparative analysis of the various startup models along the dimensions of complexity and geography management. It was found in the study that Babsons Startup Ecosystem Framework was best suited for a market like Singapore. Led by Professor Daniel Isenberg, the Babsons framework uses six domains for analyzing the entrepreneurial market. These domains include policy, human capital, culture, finance, supports and markets (Sarah Cheah, 2017). Government frames policies and implements them as per the requirement of different sectors. The Singapore government established Research Innovation and Enterprise Council (RIEC) with the Prime Minister as the chair with a view to advice the cabinet on policies about research and innovations so to build a knowledge-driven society. The University Innovation Fund (UIF), Early Stage Venture Capital (ESVF), Proof-of-concept (POC) grants and Technology Incubation Schemes (TIS) are such programs that were started to improve the entrepreneurial scenario in the country ("Singapores startup ecosystem: Have we arrived?", 2017). Startups cannot be created without financial backup. It is the most basic requirement to implement any idea. This backup is received by the startups in the form of funds from various sources. Though public funds are the common basis of fund for the early stage of startups management, venture capitals (VC) activities have also seen an increase in the initial stages. This may be attributed to the government for implementing schemes such as ESVF and others ("How Singapore Became an Entrepreneurial Hub", 2017). The city-state of Singapore saw a great shift in its culture over a period of more than a decade. In case of the startup ecosystem, this shift is seen predominantly visible. The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) report of 2016 showed that an increase of 2.6% in respondents who perceive startup as a decent career choice has been visible in Singapore over the span of a decade, from 2004 to 2014 (Wonglimpiyarat, 2013). Every startup needs support from the government to survive in the market. In case of entrepreneurs in Singapore, they have been greatly supported by the government. The startup ecosystem of Singapore saw a speedy growth of infrastructural amenities such as spaces for co-working, cultivation centers, professional services and many more owing to the unending support of the government (Sarah Cheah, 2017). The government introduced startup-friendly policies for entrepreneurs to go ahead with their innovations and flourish. Training on entrepreneurship in schools was started by the Singapore government to cultivate a strong entrepreneurial mindset amongst students. This resulted in an increase in the number of scientists and engineers over the past decades that in turn boosted the startup ecosystem. However, there are certain areas that concern the government regarding the availability of talent and costs that are required by startups. Singapore being a thinly populated nation faces a crisis of human capital, which is the most essential part of the ecosystem. Singapore provides an attractive access to the Southeast Asian Market despite having a humble domestic market. Its geographical location gives Singapore a strategic advantage as it is centered by China and India, the two rapidly growing markets. Indigenous products have been successfully exported to consumers across US, China and Indonesia- the top three in the list- that proved to be a boon to startup ecosystem of the country ("IIPLs strategic approach to accelerating the ecosystem", 2017). Effectiveness of Government schemes and plans Government plays a prominent role in promoting and establishing a startup. The support from the government is very essential for any small or large business to survive and flourish. The Singapore government has shown great support in this regard. It has introduced ad implemented several schemes that have elevated the ecosystem to a great level (Ng, 2015). The launch of schemes like TIS, POC and others as mentioned earlier, by the government provided an impetus to the startup sector. In comparison to other countries, Singapore has certain startup related laws that are more flexible and applicable. To give an instance, the bankruptcy law associated with startups holds the fastest proceedings as compared to other nations. It takes an average of ten months to resolve bankruptcy issues in Singapore whereas in other countries, the average time is close to one and a half year. The government has also set up a regulatory structure of extra financial advantage that includes tax benefits to support innovation and entrepreneurship. The evident results of these policies have been seen in the reports of World Bank in the year 2016. As per the reports, Singapores total tax rate was 18.4% profit, which in comparison to other high-income countries is very low. New investments and firms are formed based on the rigidity or flexibility of corporate tax as it has a visible impact on the formation (Wonglimpiyarat, 2013). Singapore government has introduced taxes that ensure smooth functioning of the startups. Recommendations Singapore being a newly rising economy in the world, offers increased options for starting a business ("Innovation financing policies for entrepreneurial development Cases of Singapore and Taiwan as newly industrializing economies in Asia", 2017). Compared to other countries, Singapore has startup-friendly laws that attract entrepreneurs from around the world. In contrast to western countries like Australia, Singapore has a small land area and lacks natural resources. This has led the country to develop innovative ideas and depend on human capital. Australia on the other hand, enjoys abundance of natural resources. Nonetheless, Singapore has been designated as the easiest place to do any sort of business throughout the year by World Bank ("Why Singapore?" 2017). Among the Asian nations, Singapore is gradually making a mark in the startup ecosystem management. One of Asias biggest markets, China too faces tough competition from Singapore. When it comes to foreign ownership, Singapore allows cent percent autonomy to foreign companies. It levies no restrictions to the activities of foreign companies. Other nationalities are allowed to startup business in China but with restrictions and prohibitions in certain business activities. Hong Kong is the only Asian country that gives a tough competition to Singapore as the Best Country to do businesses. Both the countries are neck to neck when it comes to easy procedures, flexible laws and so on, but Singapore excels in its tax exemptions. The salary tax in Hong Kong ranges from two to seventeen per cent whereas in Singapore it is comparatively low. A recent survey by GoDaddy illustrated that as compared to Hong Kong where 68% participants are interested in startups, only 41% Singaporeans responded positively on starting a business. Many believe that Singaporeans lack a strong entrepreneurial spirit that is in contrast to Hong Kong. Hong Kong made a historic move when it announced to build a joint innovation and technology park with Chinas Shenzhen province. It is supposed to be the largest platform for entrepreneurs looking for tech-startups in the countrys history. This takes Hong Kong a step ahead than Singapore in the startup ecosystem. Singapore boasts of an exceedingly diverse and well-developed support structure for local entrepreneurs and it is very good because it offers them a superior opening position. Nonetheless, such fostering could also dampen the fighting spirit. The country brags of a greater survival rate of firms but these firms do not take much risk. Venture capitals and other funding are invested in a much safer option of online services but not in extending the technology and manufacturing. Singapore can take a cue from Hong Kong and plan to go deeper into the field of innovation and technology. It can also build a similar technology and innovation park to encourage budding entrepreneurs of Singapore. In the year 2015, funding deals offered by Singapore stood at 220 as compared to a mere 26 in 2010. The estimated cost of thee funding deals totaled nearly to 1.6 billion US dollars in 2015 whereas the figures stood at US$80.57 million in 2010. GRAB and LAZADA have been the two single largest funding rounds in Singapore with US$350 million and US$250 million respectively. These facts further establish the fact that Singapore is the ideal place for entrepreneurs. In addition, the country has been designated as the one of the best countries for women entrepreneurs to start a business. Conclusion Singapore is a fast growing economy in the world and particularly in Asia. It allows companies and individuals from all parts of the world to set up a business here. Singapore has realized the importance of startup ecosystems and hence the government has left no stone unturned to attract more and more investors by easing the immigration and other procedures. The report highlighted these areas of startup ecosystem in Singapore and provided recommendations for future entrepreneurs. It can be said in conclusion that despite being a small country with limited resources, Singapore has successfully realized and utilized its potential to the core. References: Forbes Welcome. (2017).Forbes.com. Retrieved 10 October 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/danisenberg/2011/05/25/introducing-the-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-four-defining-characteristics/#6b1cbc295fe8. Fuerlinger, G., Fandl, U., Funke, T. (2015). The role of the state in the entrepreneurship ecosystem: insights from Germany.Triple Helix,2(1), 3. How Singapore Became an Entrepreneurial Hub. (2017).Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 10 October 2017, from https://hbr.org/2015/02/how-singapore-became-an-entrepreneurial-hub IIPLs strategic approach to accelerating the ecosystem. (2017).Digital News Asia. Retrieved 12 October 2017, from https://www.digitalnewsasia.com/sizzle-fizzle/iipl-strategic-approach-to-accelerating-the-ecosystem Innovation financing policies for entrepreneurial development Cases of Singapore and Taiwan as newly industrializing economies in Asia. (2017).Sciencedirect.com. Retrieved 10 October 2017, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047831013000199 Meet the top 20 global startup ecosystems. (2017).e27. Retrieved 10 October 2017, from https://e27.co/meet-top-20-global-startup-ecosystems-20150813/ Nadgrodkiewicz, A. (2013). Building entrepreneurship ecosystems.Economic Reform Features Services. Ng, R. K. W. (2015). An Empirical Analysis of the Singapore Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: A Case Study For BRIC Economies to Ponder. InEntrepreneurial Ecosystem(pp. 57-89). Springer India. Sarah Cheah, a. (2017).Role of Public Science in Fostering the Innovation and Startup Ecosystem in Singapore.Arpjournal.org. Retrieved 10 October 2017, from https://www.arpjournal.org/usr/browse/view_issues_detail.do?seq=132 Singapores startup ecosystem: Have we arrived?. (2017).Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved 10 October 2017, from https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-s-startup-ecosystem-have-we-arrived-8013936 Why Singapore?. (2017).Guidemesingapore.com. Retrieved 10 October 2017, from https://www.guidemesingapore.com/why-singapore. Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2013). Innovation financing policies for entrepreneurial developmentCases of Singapore and Taiwan as newly industrializing economies in Asia.The Journal of High Technology Management Research,24(2), 109-117.